
New Zealand ODIs: Two days, two different West Indies
16.07.26, 18:23 Updated 16.07.26, 18:47
Mangesh Kulkarni
There is something disorienting about an ODI series that opens on Saturday, plays a second match on Monday, then asks both teams to wait until Thursday all at the same ground. No travel, no change of scenery, no natural rhythm; just three matches in five days at the Providence Stadium in Guyana, with an odd pause in the middle that serves neither preparation nor momentum.
That scheduling quirk matters because it provides vital context to what played out across the first two days. On Saturday, West Indies were composed, purposeful, and clinical. On Monday, robbed of their momentum, they collapsed so completely, from 63 for 0 to 138 all out, that it raised questions not just about the match but about the structural reality of their ODI batting.
The series is level at 1-1, and now Thursday's third ODI feels like a must-win.
ODI One: A chase built on character
It was only the second time a total of over 250 had been chased at Guyana’s Providence Stadium. That context alone speaks to how difficult West Indies' task was on Saturday evening, and how significant their seven-wicket win turned out to be.
New Zealand had posted 267, but Santner acknowledged afterwards that they had been on course for 280 before West Indies' spinners, along with Alzarri Joseph at the death, did what this bowling attack has been doing all home season: applying pressure in phases and taking wickets when it mattered. Keacy Carty was named Player of the Match for a composed 95 off 112 balls, and Hope admitted the difficulty of batting at this ground, noting that if a player gets in, they have to go deep, which Carty did; shepherding the chase with quiet authority.
The other storyline was Vitel Lawes. He finished with 3 for 54 on his debut, but that number does not capture what made his performance so compelling. Lawes wasn't just on ODI debut, or even his West Indies debut; the 19-year-old had never played a professional match before.
It showed at the start of his first over with a series of drag-downs, but then something shifted. His final delivery of that over, a long-hop, saw Henry Nicholls swat a pull straight to midwicket. That first wicket clearly settled his nerves, as from there, the teenager bowled with a confidence that belied every line on his CV.
"He has a unique skill which we lack in the Caribbean," Hope said of Lawes afterwards. That line from the captain is the most important sentence to come out of this series so far. Left-arm wrist spin at international level is genuinely rare, and the Caribbean has been without it for a long time. In that regard, Lawes’ emergence is very noteworthy. However, as I’ll explain in a moment, West Indies might be wise to progress with caution.
Vitel Lawes Shines On Debut! | Highlights | West
ODI Two: A collapse that told a familiar story
Monday was a different game, a different surface, and a vastly different West Indies batting performance.
West Indies collapsed from 63 for 0 to be all out for 138, losing all ten wickets for 75 runs in a display that would concern any coaching staff. The surface had more grip on Monday, so the ball was turning with more vigour. This helped Jayden Lennox rack up the third-best figure by a New Zealand spinner in men's ODIs, recording 5 for 19 and dismantling the middle order. Crucially, four of his victims were emphatically bowled through the gate.
Outside of Campbell's 43, Amir Jangoo was the only West Indies batter to reach 20, but he was trapped lbw on the sweep to Bracewell. This collapse was not just statistical; it was structural. Batters fell to poor decisions against spin, and shot selection against the turning ball was questionable across the middle order. More to the point, once the top order had gone, the innings had no one capable of absorbing and rebuilding.
New Zealand completed their 400th ODI win as a result, adding a historical footnote to what was otherwise a dominant performance.
Jayden Lennox Takes 5 Wickets | Highlights | West
Uncomfortable Question 1: Is there a best XI?
West Indies are missing both of their frontline all-rounders in Chase and Greaves, who would ordinarily provide the depth and balance the batting needs at six and seven. Without them available, West Indies have five true bowlers in Joseph x2, Motie, Lawes, and Pierre, with perhaps the addition of one of Seales or Forde. The batting lineup, meanwhile, ends at seven some say six.
Could you add another batter? Technically, yes, but that would mean going to four bowlers, which against a New Zealand batting lineup with Latham, Mitchell, Bracewell, and Santner would be a big risk, bordering on reckless. The honest answer is that there is no quick structural fix. Adding Hetmyer would not solve the problem because he brings no bowling. The all-rounder depth that allows West Indies to balance the XI is simply not there right now, and that is a squad-building issue rather than a selection one.
Why don't West Indies have any home advantage?
Uncomfortable Question 2: Is an experience gap to blame?
New Zealand are missing Conway, Ravindra, Jamieson, Matt Henry, and O'Rourke. Even so, experienced campaigners Michael Bracewell and Mark Chapman bring nearly 250 international appearances between them, while Santner, Latham, Daryl Mitchell, and Nicholls are all internationally proven and in strong form. Mitchell averaged 176 in his three ODIs in 2026 before this series, and Lennox had already impressed on his debut series against India earlier this year.
This highlights that even though New Zealand are missing key players, they are still able to field a squad that would trouble most teams in the world. It also goes some way to explaining why they are the second-ranked ODI side in the world.
West Indies, meanwhile, sit tenth, almost seven ranking points behind Bangladesh in the race to directly qualify for the 2027 World Cup. Albeit given recent announcements maybe the race to qualify is now moot.
The experience gap between the two squads on the field in Guyana is not a small thing. Santner alone has played over 100 ODIs, and several of his teammates are approaching similar totals. West Indies' batting lineup, by contrast, features multiple players who are still in the early chapters of their ODI careers, with Jangoo and Auguste having a combined total of under 15 ODI appearances.
That gap shows up in moments of pressure, and on Monday it struck precisely when Lennox was turning the ball and when the middle order needed someone to absorb and rotate rather than reach for a risky shot.
Vitel Lawes: Handle with care
Lawes is the most exciting development of this series, and the temptation is to treat him as an immediate solution. That temptation should be resisted, at least partly.
The young man was born in June 2005, and before this series, he had not played a single first-class game at one-day or T20 level.
Lawes became the leading wicket-taker at the Under-19 World Cup with 10 wickets in five matches, and bowled more dot balls than any other bowler in the tournament. His raw material is undeniable and genuinely exciting. Left-arm wrist spin is a rare skill at any level, and at 19, bowling in the mid-80s with variations that already trouble international batters, his ceiling is as high as anyone’s in Caribbean cricket right now.
But, like a lot of young players, he is also erratic. The drag-downs at the start of his first over on Saturday were not a fluke, just part of who he is at this stage. He will bowl unplayable deliveries and unplayable long-hops in the same over for the next two or three years at least, because that is what wrist spinners do when they are still learning their craft. The key for West Indies is to invest in his development steadily rather than lean on him as a crutch too early. Nikita Miller being added to the coaching support staff specifically for this series is the right move. That kind of specialist mentoring is exactly what Lawes needs alongside match exposure.
What next for Vitel Lawes?
A pattern West Indies cannot ignore
Before this series, West Indies had lost their last five completed ODIs. The first match here interrupted that sequence, but the second revived it. The deeper issue is not the results themselves but the pattern beneath them: West Indies simply cannot bat consistently against quality spin, and they cannot consistently hold an innings together when top-order wickets fall quickly.
Against the better teams in the world, quality spin bowling and early wickets are guaranteed. This is not a Guyana-specific problem; it is an ODI batting culture problem that West Indies are yet to address.
Looking ahead to Thursday
The third ODI is now the hinge point of this series, and given the uncertainty over the World Cup qualification context, it carries more weight than a simple series scoreline.
West Indies need to answer the spin question with better shot selection and cleaner intent. They need their middle order to show the same patience under pressure that their Test batters have shown all summer. They need Lawes and Motie, bowling together, to create the kind of combined spin pressure that made Saturday such an effective first half of their innings. But most of all, they need Thursday to not look like Monday.
The ground, the surface, and the opposition will be the same. On trial here is the collective decision-making of a batting lineup that has shown it can chase 270 on a tricky Providence pitch, and then collapse for 138 days later.
That inconsistency is the series in miniature, and it is also the core challenge facing the West Indies ODI side.
Related Topics
Mangesh Kulkarni