Skip to main content
Opinion

Misrepresented: Why names matter in international cricket

RORY SMITH: You could argue that the West Indies proves that nations and territories are stronger as a group than if each member went it alone, and while that may be true, at least the members play under a universal banner that resonates, unites, and speaks of a shared sporting history.

29.12.25, 20:47 Updated 29.12.25, 20:47

Rory Smith

West Indies. It’s an evocative name that unites fifteen Caribbean nations and territories,  allowing them to celebrate (or commiserate) their region’s cricketing story together.

Why then is the team that represents the United Kingdom known as England? 

It seems akin to the entire West Indies being represented by a team called Jamaica. Unless you hail from Jamaica, I wager that thought made you rather angry. So imagine for a moment how the people of the wider British Isles have felt when ‘England’ has taken to the field in their name.

Cricket is often described as a quintessential English pastime, one cloaked in centuries of tradition and bound by long-standing institutions. But those traditions are shared throughout the United Kingdom, and people whose homes lie beyond England’s boundaries have long found the national team’s name a source of frustration, irritation, and exclusion.

Become a member today.

Caribbean Cricket News needs its community to support independent, high-quality coverage of West Indies Cricket. Subscribe to a monthly or annual package today to be a part of something special.

Subscribe now

Already have an account?

More like this